Ali Engineer, Asghar2019-09-252019-09-252012-01-122010-06http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/182672"India produced apostle of non-violence in the person of Gandhi in the last century and he liberated India from clutches of British colonialism through non-violent means. Many people begin to raise question in the face of such terroristic attacks on innocent civilians as to the relevance of Gandhiji’s non-violence in our era. Has Gandhi become irrelevant? Is he fit only for paying rich tributes on his birth day or day of martyrdom, and nothing else? It is for Gandhian philosophers to answer these questions. Are those who proclaim themselves to be Gandhians, take Gandhi and his philosophy seriously? Or Gandhism has also become a sort of religion with certain rituals and priesthood with certain ashrams and properties thrown in? Where are active Gandhians? Gandhi was not mere philosopher of non-violence but an active practitioner who made it a way of life."(pg 1)engWith permission of the license/copyright holderIslamic ethicsterrorismGandhianPolitical ethicsEthics of political systemsPeace ethicsReligious ethicsSpirituality and ethicsPreprint