Dewi, Siti Malaiha2019-09-252019-09-252016-06-192015-02http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/153930The focus of this paper is the attitude and the contemplation of marginal women towards money politic practices in the general election in 2014 in Kudus. There are three marginal women’s attitudes towards money politics. First, refuse the money politics. Second, receive the money politics and make money as a political choice determinant. Third, receive the money politics but does not affect their political options. Such attitudes are related to how the women define and interpret the money politics itself. The first group interprets the money politics as a bribe or in Islam called risywah. Risywah in Islam is forbidden. It was said by the Prophet Muhammad PBUH that people who bribe and accept a bribe will enter the hell. The second and third groups who receive the money politics define it as the unlikely declined fortune. Money politics is also defined as money dividing that must be issued by a candidate. Some factors which influenced the women’s attitude and contemplation towards money politics are religious background, educational background, place of residence, independence/spouses relationship, and social status.indWith permission of the license/copyright holderMoney PoliticsMarginal WomenMeaningAttitudePolitical ethicsEthics of political systemsEthics of lawRights based legal ethicsCultural ethicsCultural/intercultural ethicsCommunity ethicsSocial ethicsSexual orientation/genderEthnicity and ethicsJournal volume