Thumbnail Image
Publication

Aproximaciones al pensamiento del inicio [Aproaches to the Thinking of Beginning]

Aldegani, Emiliano
Author(s)
Aldegani, Emiliano
Contributor(s)
Keywords
indeterminacy
apeiron
Anaximander
Heidegger
Castoriadis
GE Subjects
Cultural ethics
Methods of ethics
General and historical
Philosophical ethics
Collections
Latin American Ethics
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
n2014-9_aprox.pdf
Adobe PDF, 211.98 KB
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/213922
Online Access
Abstract
"La reciente publicación de los seminarios de Cornelius Castoriadis ha permitido el acceso a una interpretación particular del pensamiento de Anaximandro, que toma como eje de su pensamiento la oposición entre lo determinado y lo indeterminado en el momento inicial de lo existente. Sin embargo, esta lectura surge también en contraposición a la interpretación de Heidegger, para quien el pensamiento de Anaximandro expresaba la tensión inicial entre el ser y la presencia. En este contexto, el artículo busca explicitar la confrontación entre las ideas de Heidegger y Castoriadis a partir de su interpretación de la sentencia de Anaximandro, desarrollando esquemáticamente su interpretación del fragmento, su vínculo con la lectura propuesta por Nietzsche, y la influencia de sus propias consideraciones ontológicas sobre la lectura que ofrecen del fragmento" ["The recent publication of the seminars delivered by Cornelius Castoriadis has allowed us to recognize a particular interpretation of Anaximander, whose thought is based on the opposition between the determined and the undetermined at the very initial moment of every existing thing. However, this interpretation has its origin as a controversy with Heidegger’s conception, according to which Anaximander thought expressed the original tension between Being and Presence. Within this context, I aim at making explicit the controversy between the ideas of Heidegger and Castoriadis dealing with their interpretations of Anaximander’s sentence. In order to account for such a controversy, I will develop a scheme of their interpretations of Anaximander’s passage, the relationships with the interpretation provided by Nietzsche, and the influence of their own ontological considerations in the interpretation of the mentioned passage"]
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Article
Date
2014
Identifier
ISBN
DOI
Copyright/License
With permission of the license/copyright holder
Embedded videos