Publication

Specifyand Distinguish! Interpreting the New Testament on `Non-Violence'

Biggar, Nigel
Author(s)
Biggar, Nigel
Contributor(s)
Keywords
biblical ethics
ethics of Jesus
just war
New Testament ethics
non-violence
pacifism
Richard Hays
GE Subjects
Religious ethics
Spirituality and ethics
Methods of ethics
Theological ethics
Philosophical ethics
Collections
Peace-Building and Conflict Resolution
Show all metadata
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12424/4022965
Online Access
https://globethics.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0953946809103490
Abstract
Widely showered with superlatives when it was first published in 1996, and now commonly regarded as a masterpiece, Richard Hays's The Moral Vision of the New Testament (1996) constructs a pacifist reading of the New Testament. To date, Hays's reading has provoked no systematic refutation from proponents of the doctrine of just war. This essay hopes to offer such a refutation. Its argument has three main planks. First, that Hays's reading of the New Testament stories about god-fearing soldiers, who persist in their profession, is not compelling; second, that he fails to specify sufficiently the meaning of Jesus' teaching and conduct in terms of Jesus' own context (particularly the option of armed violence in the service of religiously inspired nationalism); and third, that Hays's normative moral concepts are often too crude, suffering from a failure to employ valid moral distinctions. The essay concludes by arguing that the doctrine of just war is better able than pacifism to make adequate sense of all the relevant New Testament data.
Note(s)
Topic
Type
Article
Date
2009-05
Identifier
SAGE-10.1177/0953946809103490
ISSN-0953-9468
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0953946809103490
ISBN
DOI
10.1177/0953946809103490
Copyright/License
SAGE Publications
Embedded videos